Updated 2026-03-20
Betterment vs Slavic401k 401(k) Comparison
Compare Betterment at Work (#20, 6.7/10) and Slavic401k (#25, 6.1/10) side by side across fees, ratings, features, and investment options.
Overall Comparison
| Feature | Betterment | Slavic401k |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 6.7/10 | 6.1/10 |
| Rank | #20 | #25 |
| AUM | $45 billion | $3 billion |
| Participants | 400,000 | 50,000 |
| Plan Sponsors | 1,500+ | 2,500+ |
| Founded | 2010 | 1995 |
Ratings Comparison
| Category | Betterment | Slavic401k |
|---|---|---|
| Fees & Costs | 4.0/5 | 3.2/5 |
| Investment Options | 3.2/5 | 4.8/5 |
| Customer Service | 4.0/5 | 3.4/5 |
| Mobile App | 4.4/5 | 3.0/5 |
Fee Comparison
| Fee Type | Betterment | Slavic401k |
|---|---|---|
| Admin Fees | $150/month + $6/employee | $1,200 - $2,500/year + per-participant |
| Expense Ratios | 0.03% - 0.15% | Varies by investment choice |
| Trading Fees | $0 | $0 for stocks/ETFs, varies for options |
| Advisory Fees | Included in platform fee | N/A - self-directed |
Betterment Strengths
- Fully automated portfolio management
- Tax-loss harvesting and tax-smart strategies
- Clean, modern user interface
- Low-cost ETF portfolios
Slavic401k Strengths
- Full self-directed brokerage within 401(k)
- Trade individual stocks, ETFs, options
- Maximum investment flexibility
- TD Ameritrade/Schwab brokerage window
Rollover, Loans & Withdrawals
| Feature | Betterment | Slavic401k |
|---|---|---|
| Rollover Platform | Betterment App | Slavic401k Portal |
| Loans Available | No | Yes |
| Withdrawal Methods | Online via Betterment app, Email support | Phone (800-356-3009), Online portal |
| Distribution Options | Lump sum, Partial withdrawal, Rollover to IRA, Required Minimum Distributions | Lump sum, Partial withdrawal, In-kind transfer of securities, Rollover to IRA, Required Minimum Distributions |
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Betterment if you want:
- Tech companies
- Startups
- Hands-off investors
- ESG-conscious employers
Choose Slavic401k if you want:
- Self-directed investors
- Active traders
- Sophisticated investors
- Those wanting maximum 401(k) flexibility
Our Verdict: Betterment vs Slavic401k
Betterment at Work wins this comparison with a score of 6.7/10 vs 6.1/10. Betterment excels with fully automated portfolio management, making it the stronger choice for most investors in this matchup. However, the best choice ultimately depends on your specific needs, employer plan availability, and investment preferences.
Other Popular Comparisons
Compare these 401(k) providers head-to-head
Vanguard vs Slavic401kCompare these 401(k) providers head-to-head
Schwab vs Slavic401kCompare these 401(k) providers head-to-head
Empower vs Slavic401kCompare these 401(k) providers head-to-head
T. Rowe Price vs Slavic401kCompare these 401(k) providers head-to-head
Principal vs Slavic401kCompare these 401(k) providers head-to-head
Betterment vs Slavic401k: Complete 401(k) Comparison for 2026
Choosing between Betterment at Work and Slavic401k for your 401(k) is an important decision that affects your retirement savings. Betterment offers robo-advisor while Slavic401k is known for self-directed. In terms of fees, Betterment charges 0.03% - 0.15% expense ratios compared to Slavic401k's Varies by investment choice. Betterment manages $45 billion in assets and serves 400,000 participants, while Slavic401k has $3 billion AUM and 50,000 participants.
Key Differences: Betterment vs Slavic401k
When comparing Betterment and Slavic401k, consider their core strengths: Betterment excels with fully automated portfolio management, while Slavic401k stands out for full self-directed brokerage within 401(k). Both providers offer a wide range of investment options including target-date funds, index funds, and managed accounts. Betterment's customer service rating is 4.0/5 compared to Slavic401k's 3.4/5. For mobile experience, Betterment scores 4.4/5 while Slavic401k scores 3.0/5.
Which Provider is Right for You?
Choose Betterment if you prioritize tech companies. Choose Slavic401k if you're looking for self-directed investors. Your decision should also consider your employer's plan availability, fee sensitivity, desired investment options, and customer service expectations. For detailed reviews, visit our individual Betterment and Slavic401k provider pages.
Frequently Asked Questions
Betterment at Work scores higher in our 2026 rankings with 6.7/10. Betterment is best for tech companies, while Slavic401k is best for self-directed investors. The right choice depends on your employer's plan and your priorities.
Betterment charges expense ratios of 0.03% - 0.15% with admin fees of $150/month + $6/employee. Slavic401k charges Varies by investment choice expense ratios with admin fees of $1,200 - $2,500/year + per-participant. Betterment's fees rating is 4.0/5 compared to Slavic401k's 3.2/5.
Yes, you can roll over between Betterment and Slavic401k. Betterment uses Betterment App for rollovers, while Slavic401k uses Slavic401k Portal. A direct rollover avoids mandatory tax withholding. Contact your new provider to initiate the transfer.
Betterment does not offer 401(k) loans. Slavic401k offers 401(k) loans.
Betterment scores 3.2/5 for investment options, while Slavic401k scores 4.8/5. Both offer target-date funds, index funds, and managed accounts. Betterment's investment options include ETF Portfolios, Target Date Portfolios, Socially Responsible Portfolios. Slavic401k offers Individual Stocks, ETFs, Mutual Funds.
For small businesses, consider plan minimums and per-participant costs. Betterment is best for tech companies, startups, hands-off investors, esg-conscious employers. Slavic401k is best for self-directed investors, active traders, sophisticated investors, those wanting maximum 401(k) flexibility. Compare admin fees: Betterment charges $150/month + $6/employee vs Slavic401k's $1,200 - $2,500/year + per-participant.
Pavlo Pyskunov
Managing Director & Investment Fund Director
Pavlo Pyskunov analyzes employer-sponsored retirement plans using IRS publications and DOL Form 5500 filings, helping workers maximize their 401(k) savings through data-driven guidance.
Last updated: 2026-03-20