Updated 2026-03-30
John Hancock vs Transamerica 401(k) Comparison
Compare John Hancock (#10, 7.7/10) and Transamerica (#11, 7.5/10) side by side across fees, ratings, features, and investment options.
Overall Comparison
| Feature | John Hancock | Transamerica |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 7.7/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Rank | #10 | #11 |
| AUM | $600 billion | $300 billion |
| Participants | 3 million | 6 million |
| Plan Sponsors | 48,000+ | 35,000+ |
| Founded | 1862 | 1904 |
Ratings Comparison
| Category | John Hancock | Transamerica |
|---|---|---|
| Fees & Costs | 3.5/5 | 3.6/5 |
| Investment Options | 3.7/5 | 3.7/5 |
| Customer Service | 4.0/5 | 3.8/5 |
| Mobile App | 3.6/5 | 3.5/5 |
Fee Comparison
| Fee Type | John Hancock | Transamerica |
|---|---|---|
| Admin Fees | $1,000 - $4,000/year | $750 - $3,000/year |
| Expense Ratios | 0.30% - 1.3% | 0.25% - 1.2% |
| Trading Fees | Plan dependent | Plan dependent |
| Advisory Fees | 0.40% - 0.90% | 0.35% - 0.85% |
John Hancock Strengths
- Unique wellness program integration
- Vitality rewards for healthy behavior
- Strong financial wellness education
- complete planning tools
Transamerica Strengths
- complete financial wellness programs
- Flexible plan design options
- Strong educational resources and tools
- Integrated workplace benefits platform
Rollover, Loans & Withdrawals
| Feature | John Hancock | Transamerica |
|---|---|---|
| Rollover Platform | myplan.johnhancock.com | Transamerica.com |
| Loans Available | Yes | Yes |
| Withdrawal Methods | Online via myplan.johnhancock.com, Phone (800-395-1113) | Online via Transamerica.com, Phone (800-755-5801) |
| Distribution Options | Lump sum, Partial withdrawal, Installment payments, Rollover to IRA | Lump sum, Partial withdrawal, Installment payments, Rollover to IRA |
Which Should You Choose?
Choose John Hancock if you want:
- Wellness-focused employers
- Mid-sized companies
- Insurance bundle seekers
Choose Transamerica if you want:
- Mid-sized companies
- Integrated benefits seekers
- Financial wellness focus
Our Verdict: John Hancock vs Transamerica
John Hancock wins this comparison with a score of 7.7/10 vs 7.5/10. John Hancock excels with unique wellness program integration, making it the stronger choice for most investors in this matchup. However, the best choice ultimately depends on your specific needs, employer plan availability, and investment preferences.
Other Popular Comparisons
Compare these 401(k) providers head-to-head
Vanguard vs TransamericaCompare these 401(k) providers head-to-head
Schwab vs TransamericaCompare these 401(k) providers head-to-head
Empower vs TransamericaCompare these 401(k) providers head-to-head
T. Rowe Price vs TransamericaCompare these 401(k) providers head-to-head
Principal vs TransamericaCompare these 401(k) providers head-to-head
John Hancock vs Transamerica: Complete 401(k) Comparison for 2026
Choosing between John Hancock and Transamerica for your 401(k) is an important decision that affects your retirement savings. John Hancock offers wellness focus while Transamerica is known for workplace benefits. In terms of fees, John Hancock charges 0.30% - 1.3% expense ratios compared to Transamerica's 0.25% - 1.2%. John Hancock manages $600 billion in assets and serves 3 million participants, while Transamerica has $300 billion AUM and 6 million participants.
Key Differences: John Hancock vs Transamerica
When comparing John Hancock and Transamerica, consider their core strengths: John Hancock excels with unique wellness program integration, while Transamerica stands out for complete financial wellness programs. Both providers offer a wide range of investment options including target-date funds, index funds, and managed accounts. John Hancock's customer service rating is 4.0/5 compared to Transamerica's 3.8/5. For mobile experience, John Hancock scores 3.6/5 while Transamerica scores 3.5/5.
Which Provider is Right for You?
Choose John Hancock if you prioritize wellness-focused employers. Choose Transamerica if you're looking for mid-sized companies. Your decision should also consider your employer's plan availability, fee sensitivity, desired investment options, and customer service expectations. For detailed reviews, visit our individual John Hancock and Transamerica provider pages.
Frequently Asked Questions
John Hancock scores higher in our 2026 rankings with 7.7/10. John Hancock is best for wellness-focused employers, while Transamerica is best for mid-sized companies. The right choice depends on your employer's plan and your priorities.
John Hancock charges expense ratios of 0.30% - 1.3% with admin fees of $1,000 - $4,000/year. Transamerica charges 0.25% - 1.2% expense ratios with admin fees of $750 - $3,000/year. John Hancock's fees rating is 3.5/5 compared to Transamerica's 3.6/5.
Yes, you can roll over between John Hancock and Transamerica. John Hancock uses myplan.johnhancock.com for rollovers, while Transamerica uses Transamerica.com. A direct rollover avoids mandatory tax withholding. Contact your new provider to initiate the transfer.
John Hancock offers 401(k) loans. Transamerica offers 401(k) loans. Both providers typically allow loans up to 50% of your vested balance or $50,000, whichever is less.
John Hancock scores 3.7/5 for investment options, while Transamerica scores 3.7/5. Both offer target-date funds, index funds, and managed accounts. John Hancock's investment options include Mutual Funds, Target Date Funds, Stable Value. Transamerica offers Mutual Funds, Target Date Funds, Stable Value.
For small businesses, consider plan minimums and per-participant costs. John Hancock is best for wellness-focused employers, mid-sized companies, insurance bundle seekers. Transamerica is best for mid-sized companies, integrated benefits seekers, financial wellness focus. Compare admin fees: John Hancock charges $1,000 - $4,000/year vs Transamerica's $750 - $3,000/year.
Pavlo Pyskunov
Managing Director & Investment Fund Director
Pavlo Pyskunov analyzes employer-sponsored retirement plans using IRS publications and DOL Form 5500 filings, helping workers maximize their 401(k) savings through data-driven guidance.
Last updated: 2026-03-30