Updated 2026-03-30

T. Rowe Price vs John Hancock 401(k) Comparison

Compare T. Rowe Price (#5, 8.5/10) and John Hancock (#10, 7.7/10) side by side across fees, ratings, features, and investment options.

Overall Comparison

FeatureT. Rowe PriceJohn Hancock
Overall Score8.5/107.7/10
Rank#5#10
AUM$1.3 trillion$600 billion
Participants10 million3 million
Plan Sponsors4,500+48,000+
Founded19371862

Ratings Comparison

CategoryT. Rowe PriceJohn Hancock
Fees & Costs3.8/53.5/5
Investment Options4.6/53.7/5
Customer Service4.4/54.0/5
Mobile App4.2/53.6/5

Fee Comparison

Fee TypeT. Rowe PriceJohn Hancock
Admin Fees$0 - $50/year$1,000 - $4,000/year
Expense Ratios0.30% - 1.2%0.30% - 1.3%
Trading Fees$0 for T. Rowe Price fundsPlan dependent
Advisory Fees0.30% - 1.25%0.40% - 0.90%

T. Rowe Price Strengths

John Hancock Strengths

Rollover, Loans & Withdrawals

FeatureT. Rowe PriceJohn Hancock
Rollover PlatformIndividual.troweprice.commyplan.johnhancock.com
Loans AvailableYesYes
Withdrawal MethodsOnline portal, Phone (800-225-5132)Online via myplan.johnhancock.com, Phone (800-395-1113)
Distribution OptionsLump sum, Partial withdrawal, Installment payments, Rollover to IRALump sum, Partial withdrawal, Installment payments, Rollover to IRA

Which Should You Choose?

Choose T. Rowe Price if you want:

  • Active fund believers
  • Target-date fund users
  • Research-oriented investors
  • Long-term holders

Choose John Hancock if you want:

  • Wellness-focused employers
  • Mid-sized companies
  • Insurance bundle seekers

Our Verdict: T. Rowe Price vs John Hancock

T. Rowe Price wins this comparison with a score of 8.5/10 vs 7.7/10. T. Rowe Price excels with excellent actively managed fund performance, making it the stronger choice for most investors in this matchup. However, the best choice ultimately depends on your specific needs, employer plan availability, and investment preferences.

Full T. Rowe Price Review Full John Hancock Review

Other Popular Comparisons

Fidelity vs John Hancock

Compare these 401(k) providers head-to-head

Vanguard vs John Hancock

Compare these 401(k) providers head-to-head

Schwab vs John Hancock

Compare these 401(k) providers head-to-head

Empower vs John Hancock

Compare these 401(k) providers head-to-head

T. Rowe Price vs Principal

Compare these 401(k) providers head-to-head

T. Rowe Price vs ADP

Compare these 401(k) providers head-to-head

T. Rowe Price vs John Hancock: Complete 401(k) Comparison for 2026

Choosing between T. Rowe Price and John Hancock for your 401(k) is an important decision that affects your retirement savings. T. Rowe Price offers active management while John Hancock is known for wellness focus. In terms of fees, T. Rowe Price charges 0.30% - 1.2% expense ratios compared to John Hancock's 0.30% - 1.3%. T. Rowe Price manages $1.3 trillion in assets and serves 10 million participants, while John Hancock has $600 billion AUM and 3 million participants.

Key Differences: T. Rowe Price vs John Hancock

When comparing T. Rowe Price and John Hancock, consider their core strengths: T. Rowe Price excels with excellent actively managed fund performance, while John Hancock stands out for unique wellness program integration. Both providers offer a wide range of investment options including target-date funds, index funds, and managed accounts. T. Rowe Price's customer service rating is 4.4/5 compared to John Hancock's 4.0/5. For mobile experience, T. Rowe Price scores 4.2/5 while John Hancock scores 3.6/5.

Which Provider is Right for You?

Choose T. Rowe Price if you prioritize active fund believers. Choose John Hancock if you're looking for wellness-focused employers. Your decision should also consider your employer's plan availability, fee sensitivity, desired investment options, and customer service expectations. For detailed reviews, visit our individual T. Rowe Price and John Hancock provider pages.

Frequently Asked Questions

T. Rowe Price scores higher in our 2026 rankings with 8.5/10. T. Rowe Price is best for active fund believers, while John Hancock is best for wellness-focused employers. The right choice depends on your employer's plan and your priorities.

T. Rowe Price charges expense ratios of 0.30% - 1.2% with admin fees of $0 - $50/year. John Hancock charges 0.30% - 1.3% expense ratios with admin fees of $1,000 - $4,000/year. T. Rowe Price's fees rating is 3.8/5 compared to John Hancock's 3.5/5.

Yes, you can roll over between T. Rowe Price and John Hancock. T. Rowe Price uses Individual.troweprice.com for rollovers, while John Hancock uses myplan.johnhancock.com. A direct rollover avoids mandatory tax withholding. Contact your new provider to initiate the transfer.

T. Rowe Price offers 401(k) loans. John Hancock offers 401(k) loans. Both providers typically allow loans up to 50% of your vested balance or $50,000, whichever is less.

T. Rowe Price scores 4.6/5 for investment options, while John Hancock scores 3.7/5. Both offer target-date funds, index funds, and managed accounts. T. Rowe Price's investment options include Active Mutual Funds, Target Date Funds, Index Funds. John Hancock offers Mutual Funds, Target Date Funds, Stable Value.

For small businesses, consider plan minimums and per-participant costs. T. Rowe Price is best for active fund believers, target-date fund users, research-oriented investors, long-term holders. John Hancock is best for wellness-focused employers, mid-sized companies, insurance bundle seekers. Compare admin fees: T. Rowe Price charges $0 - $50/year vs John Hancock's $1,000 - $4,000/year.

Pavlo Pyskunov

Pavlo Pyskunov

Managing Director & Investment Fund Director

Pavlo Pyskunov analyzes employer-sponsored retirement plans using IRS publications and DOL Form 5500 filings, helping workers maximize their 401(k) savings through data-driven guidance.

Last updated: 2026-03-30